Chicken Rice

Once of the most standard dishes in Singapore, the famous Hainanese Chicken Rice. Easy to make, light to the taste, and adaptable for all situations.

Ingredients
Chicken
Cilantro
Cucumber
Sesame oil
Light soya sauce
Rice
Ginger
Salt

Method
Cook your rice as per normal in a rice cooker, but add your chicken meat whole as well. This saves on cooking time, but it will taste better if you cook the chicken separately, however, if you do this, you would have to use chicken stock to cook your rice. Following our original plan, add the chicken into the rice and cook it together, also add a few slices of ginger, some sesame oil, and salt. Cook the mixture. Slice the cucumbers and cilantro for garnish. Once the rice is done, take out the chicken, slice it up. Serve on plate with garnish, add some light soya sauce and chilli sauce if required.

Dobin Mushi

This is a classic Japanese soup dish that has one of the most unique tastes. There is a slight burnt flavor that comes from the dashi stock cooked in a clay pot, an earthy flavor from the mushrooms, and a sour tinge from the citrus lime that is added. Definitely worth the effort on a cold night. This soup is typically served in a small clay tea pot with a small drinking cup. The size of the pot seals the flavor in, but if you don't have a clay pot, you could use any other pot that can be used to boil soup on low heat for extended times. Also, the typical soup is cooked using Matsutake mushrooms, which are very very expensive. I've used Shiitake mushrooms as substitute here, for the the poor man's version, but of course, nothing beats the original ingredients. Try as best you can to secure the freshest matsutake.

Ingredients
1. Matsutake or shiitake mushrooms (fresh is best, but if dried, soak overnight first)
2. Fish dashi (best made using the fish flakes you see on tofu dishes, that curl and move when served)
3. Soya sauce
4. Sake or rice wine
5. Cilantro
6. Shrimp
7. Chicken
8. Lime

Method
Soak the dashi overnight. Cut the mushrooms, shrimp and chicken into small bite size pieces, you don't need too much of this, just a small portion. Bring the dashi stock to a boil for about 10-15 min. Once the dashi flavor is cooked into the stock, remove the dashi, leaving the stock. Add a spoon of soya sauce, and a spoon of sake. Add the mushrooms, shrimp and chicken into the boiling stock and cook for about 10-15 min. Add lime juice from half a small lime, garnish with cilantro, and serve.

Grilled Steak

Oo La La. Fresh off my $10 grill from Walmart. Steak seasoned in red wine and thyme, asparagus, green peas, potatoes, and oh-so-good dinner rolls from the beefhouse, all done on the grill. Nice cool weather outside 52F, and sitting beside the glowing embers.

How To Make Teh Tarik

Teh Tarik, literally, pulled tea, is actually an Indian method of making milk tea. The milk tea containing condensed milk is poured from one container to another, which cools the tea down, and at the same time, introduces air bubbles. This gives it a lighter texture, and, as with most interactions between liquid consumables (such as wine) and air, brings out more flavor. Although, the average tea drinker will probably never notice the difference, watching the process of making this tea is a treat in itself.

The name Teh Tarik, is in fact a Malaysian word. Tarik means pull in Malay. This meshing of words and cultures is a result of exchange happening in the South East Asian regions because of the multi-cultural backgrounds present.

Presenting, how to make teh tarik...

Park-O Tex-O

As part of the lab shift to Dallas, we went down to check it out in the Lone Star state. I shun bian say hello to Mei. There are several ways to get to Dallas from Champaign. Drive = 12 hrs, Direct 6am flight from CMI airport to DFW airport = 2 hrs, mid-day flights with transit from CMI-ORD-DFW = 4hrs, staying put = priceless. Anyway, we took option number 3 and, as you can see, we start out strong. The flight was pretty good, from ORD to DFW, we got personal TV units, slightly larger plane. But then at touchdown, we had to wait pretty long for luggage, because it was such a big flight. Then we wait for Mr Hebrank to come pick us up after his game of Ultimate.

The car rental place is a 7 min shuttle bus ride from the terminal itself. And once you arrive there, its a humungous air-conned art museum, with car rental outlets just lined up for you to choose. Our Ultimate man came by, we rented an SUV, and drove to our hotel, Embassy Suites at Lovefield, Dallas. We then quickly got ready for dinner with Mei and John. Which was at a nearby steakhouse.



It was nice to catch up again. And it was fun to have the lab people along too.

After which, we checked into our huge room in the Embassy Suites.

The next day, we went to the Brain Health Center, which is just a few minutes away. Very impressive building. Very artsy. Definitely a good place to work. Right now, the lab space is still under construction, but when its done, it will be awesome.










After that we went to where the scanner is at the hospital. Also another artsy building. We got some scans done, and then, for us, we had to head back to good ole Chambana.














So of course, what would flying be if there were no delays? So they introduced a little 1 1/2 hr delay for us at DFW. But otherwise, the flight was ok. Got back...showered. And bed = priceless.

Check out the rest of the pictures by clicking here.

Oh yeah...this has got to be the best introduction ever...

Models that Account for the Same Data: The God Account

In reference to my post about models that account for the same data, one possible explanation for why there are so many religions is because of the principal component function in our minds (refer to the post). Here, we have the same data. But we refer to different dimensions to explain the data. Sometimes even omitting certain dimensions. Such omissions would lead to certain biases in explaining the data. And to the extent that the bias is critical (that is, to the extent that these biases are necessary for accounting for the truth), our explanation of the data will be off from reality. To the extent that the biases are not critical, we will not be off from reality.

The most accurate model therefore, is the one that most closely matches reality. Yet how are we to know reality? This is the problem of knowledge. Can we truly ever know anything since we are limited to our senses, five in all, and perhaps a little more. We have 5 dimensional information, and perhaps a little more. What if the data were more multi-dimensioned than our senses can experience? Even if we had secondary ways of measuring data from dimensions beyond our perception, our experience is still bounded by our perceptions. Thus, it appears that to ascertain reality, we need to transcend our 5 senses. But even then, how many senses or dimensions should we transcend? In theory, infinite. Which is of course, flatly impossible.

Therefore, the question is not about empirical proof anymore. We realize empiricism, limited to 5 senses, cannot ascertain reality. Really, all empiricism does is to come up with models to account for data within the 5 senses. Which has no consequence on reality itself.

We are back to the question: How can we know what reality is?

Models that Account for the Same Data

Perhaps what our minds are doing is accounting for the data. The data is everything around us that we experience with our senses. This information is fed into our neurons, which, by virtue of their network organization, perform some sort of operation on this information. This operation can be likened to a form of model fitting (for those of you who are familiar with the modeling world). Our neurons constantly flux in an effort to represent the information we encounter in the most stable possible way, that allows us to incorporate new information as well as to maintain old information, and even to allow old information to modify new ones.

Consider the method called principal components analysis. This is nothing but redefining the data in terms of another set of dimensions. It thus appears that the same data can be understood in different ways, without changing the data one bit. Furthermore, using one set of dimensions over another set is simply dependent on one's goals or assumptions when trying to arrive at an explanation or investigation.

So then, the question is, which approach is scientific?

On The Way...

So you see ah...so busy until the blog fresquenscies is so slow lah. Anyway lah. Updache all a bits. First, Charlene birthday happened. We celebrated with homemade spaghetti: shrimp, mushrooms, marinara sauce, red wine, and these three cakes from Cake Artist Studios on Bloomington Rd, Champaign, IL. Very good! If I remember correctly, one is called black berry something, one is called cappuccino something, and the last one is called chocolate something...something.

Then I had to go to Ann Arbor, MI to give a talk. This was kind of a last minute thing. But then had to go lor. Drive for 5.5 hrs (acherly, Charlene drove lah, atta girl!). Then stayed over night there before giving the talk the next day to the bunch at UMich. Quite a good crowd acherly. Met Ah Yu there, he was giving a talk too. We ate at some Korean restaurant thingy. Then after the talk, we drove back (another 5.5 hrs) but via Indianapolis, to go to The Beefhouse. Note: Beefhouse is at exit 4 on I-74 heading west, just before crossing the Indiana/Illinois border. Very good meat! Mmmm...can go back again...so by now, you should be able to tell, that I am somewhat broke oredi. Donations are welcome [www.gimmemahni.com].

And finally, I got my Master's in Psycho. Now, I am a certified genius, I'm sure! Certified man. got paper leh. Hopefully this paper can hepped me earn more mahni. If not, then is din deh lah. So all in all, although got many thing going on...its moving lah. Slowly but surely. For more good years!